Save Babies! Save New York! Save America!
the Evil Law of Late-Term Abortion!
On January 22, 2019, New York State governor
Andrew Cuomo signed the Reproductive Health Act (RHA). Despite the fact
that New York law already permits abortion for any reason during the
first 24 weeks of pregnancy, Gov. Cuomo and others still pushed through the RHA, which legalizes the abortion “on demand” even
at the late-term or the third trimester of pregnancy up till the moment
of birth. That’s the most evil law ever passed in the modern
to the Guttmacher Institute, New
York already has the highest abortion rate in the nation with an abortion rate
of 29.6 per 1,000 women twice the national average of 14.6 per
1,000. In 2014, some 119,940
abortions were carried out in New York. Approximately 35% of pregnancy
in New York ended in
abortion, and 50% of African American women ended their pregnancy
in abortion. This means that for every two babies born in New York, one
baby was aborted and killed before he/she could enter this world, and
for every black baby born in New York, one black baby was killed in
abortion. That's horrible.
While many people hailed the Reproductive Health Act
(RHA) as the victory for women's rights, they don't know the evil plot of
Satan behind the scene. With the newly passed RHA, the abortion
rate could be significantly higher and more babies would be killed on
their way to this world, and more women will be hurt by this evil law.
Here are the evil
parts of this Reproductive Health Act (RHA) and how we can protect
women's rights without killing babies as the human sacrifice:
I. The Devil
is in the Details
1. The RHA Will Kill More Babies
The RHA creates a broad health exception for
late-term abortion, which allow women to abort fully viable fetuses for
essentially any reason, including economic or familial health.
On the surface, it states "According
to the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional judgment based
on the facts of the patient's case: the patient is within twenty-four
weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence
of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the
patient's life or health."
Sounds reasonable, right? The main problem
is the last sentence, "or the abortion is necessary to protect the
patient's life or health." Actually, the main issue is
the last word, the patient's "Health". Those
unethical doctors or lawyers can create numerous interpretations and loopholes on
this word alone. So, what kind of health condition worth the killing of
a baby in the late-term pregnancy?
Many women suffered depression during or
post the pregnancy. Some women even committed suicide or filicide after giving
birth to their children. Is Postpartum Depression a serious health issue? Of
course it is. But does it give a woman the right to kill her new-born baby? No,
absolutely not. So what's the difference between a baby one week from delivery
and a baby one week after the delivery? Almost nothing biologically.
During the woman's pregnant period, there are
always some health-related issues coming up. Should we use any of these
health issues as an excuse for abortion? No. There is actually a better
alternative to the late-term abortion for women who are facing some
health issues during the third trimester of pregnancy. That’s the C-section surgery, which is much simpler and safer than abortion during the late-term pregnancy.
Based on information
from the Quint
Boenker Preemie Survival Foundation and
of Dimes, here is the likelihood of
survival for a baby born prematurely.
28 to 31 weeks
90 to 95 percent
32 to 33 weeks
Almost as likely as a full-term
After 27 weeks of pregnancy, the
baby born prematurely would have 90% survival rate, and after 32 weeks
of pregnancy, the baby born prematurely would have 95% survival rate. After 34 weeks of pregnancy, the baby would be born almost as
likely as a full-term baby. Why does anyone want to create a law for abortion up to the moment of birth?
What kind of health
condition can supersede the life of a baby with 90%+ survival
With the current advanced medical
technology, the C-section surgery is much simpler, safer and more humane
than crushing baby's skull inside mother's womb and cutting baby's body
piece by piece to take them out of mother's womb. There is simply no need
for a late-term abortion, with some rare exception I will address in the
What even worse in this RHA, by repealing the original Public Health Law, it
would allow for viable infants born alive during an abortion to die
without any medical treatment. According to the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
babies are sometimes born alive during attempted abortions. For
instance, in 2011, the CDC recorded 1,298 cases of infant death in the
U.S. that were due to “other perinatal conditions,” which includes
ICD-10 category P96.4, death subsequent to a failed “termination of pregnancy.”
Now, with the new
RHA, these babies could be treated as the "by-products" of a
failed abortion and let them die without any medical treatment, and then
to be thrown into the garbage bag as the "biological waste" from a failed
operation. How cruel is
that! If that is not evil, what else?
2. The RHA Will Hurt More Women
While many women's rights advocators applauded the
RHA as the advancement in women's rights movement, they don't understand
what kind of risk and hurt it would cause to women.
The original Public Health Law requires late-term
abortions occur only in professional hospitals, but the new RHA repeals that
provision and permits the performance of late-term abortions in facilities other than hospitals and by individuals
other than duly licensed physicians. That could increase the risk of
death for the women during the abortion.
According to studies, including “Risk
Factors for Legal Induced Abortion-Related Mortality in the United
published by Obstetrics & Gynecology, the “risk of death ... for
women obtaining legally induced abortions ... increases exponentially
by 38 percent for each additional week of gestation.
practitioner or general doctor might be able to provide some good
advice on health-related issues about pregnancy and abortion, but to
let them perform a late-term abortion in facilities other than
simply irresponsible. There could be many complications during the
late-term abortion. Even in the general hospitals, the risk of death still
exists for late-term abortion, let alone in non-hospital facilities and by individuals
other than duly licensed physicians.
The RHA makes it easier for women to have access
to abortion service, which would entice many young and misinformed
women to take the bait to abort their unborn babies. After several
abortions, some women might lose the capability to be pregnant again and lose
the opportunity of becoming a mother forever. Many misinformed and ill-advised women who took abortion in their young and
reckless age now regret their decisions, but a life lost could never
On the other hand, many women got pregnant at the
inconvenient time or with financial trouble at an early age. They also
thought of abortion, but in the end, they still decided to bring their
babies to this world. Thirty years later, they are all happy about their
decision of keeping their babies without abortion and seeing them
growing up and got married too.
With the RHA, many unborn babies would be lost and many
women would be living in grieve and regret for their unthoughtful
decision emboldened by this unethical law.
3. The RHA Will Protect Criminals More Than
Women and Babies
The RHA also re-victimizes victims of
sex trafficking and domestic violence by completely taking abortion out
of New York’s penal laws. The abortion-related provisions in
New York’s criminal statutes allow women to hold abusers accountable
for the death of unborn children and for coerced abortions. With the RHA
enacted, women can no longer hold violent partners, criminals and
sex-traffickers criminally accountable for killing unborn children.
Studies, including “Acknowledging
a Persistent Truth: Domestic Violence in Pregnancy,”
published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, show that
domestic violence escalates in pregnancy, with significant consequences
for women and their unborn children, including death.
Further, studies also show that victims of
domestic violence and sex trafficking undergo coerced, but otherwise “safe
and legal,” abortions. These studies, include, respectively, “Associations
Between Intimate Partner Violence and Termination of Pregnancy: A
Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis,”
published in PLOS Medicine, and “The
Health Consequences of Sex Trafficking, Their Implications for
Identifying Victims in Healthcare Facilities,” published
in Beazley Institute for Health Law & Policy. With the new RHA, these criminals could easily escape the prosecution of
the law for killing unborn children and coerced abortions.
abortion doctors chose to inject the lethal medicine into baby's skull
to kill the baby first before the abortion. That's the same lethal
injection used in the death penalty for the worst criminals on the
earth. Now, with many states banning the death penalty, even those worst
criminals like serial killers and rapists are spared from the lethal
injection. How could those hypocritical politicians call for the
abolishment of death penalties for serious criminals but advocate the
lethal injection for an innocent nine-month old baby in her mother's
womb? How cold-blooded
are those abortion doctors to inject the lethal medicine into an eight-
or nine-month old baby's brain?
From the three aspects revealed above, it is clear why this RHA is the most evil law ever passed in modern American history. In the past, people often made the joke that the devil is in the details. Now, you see the real devil in this
so-called Reproductive Health Act (RHA).
II. How to Protect
Women's Rights without Killing Babies
Many supporters of RHA often repeated the same
story of a woman diagnosed with cancer at the late-term pregnancy. She
had to spend $25,000 to go to another state to perform an abortion due to the
24-week limit in the state of New York. Even though this is a very rare
case, it still deserves the merit of a solution.
Actually, the solution to this problem can be very simple - the Court of Appeal.
All she had to do is to ask her doctor to provide a diagnosis report on her illness and a letter of recommendation for abortion. No
judge with reasonable common sense will reject this kind of appeal when a mother is facing some life-threatening or terminal illnesses.
In the United States, people take death sentence very cautiously if not totally banned. Even a serial killer has to go
through multiple court hearings for a death sentence.
How could a baby at
late-term pregnancy be sentenced to death without a court hearing?
All legislators have to do is to create a
provision in the law to allow patients with terminal illness to appeal
to the court for abortion. It can be a very quick approval procedure
with the proper documents due to the time-sensitive reason. It will protect
women's rights in case of the life-threatening health issue, but will not
encourage people to have unnecessary abortions killing innocent babies.
There is absolutely no need to create a law for "Open Abortion at
Will" at the late-term pregnancy if we can have a Court Appeal
Mechanism for abortion.
According to the study, 90% of women went through abortion because of the inconvenience of the unexpected pregnancy, not
because of serious health issues. It's better to control your hormone
and manage your sexual behavior with proper protection than killing
innocent unborn babies, especially at the late-term pregnancy. If people getting involved in a car accident with bodily injury should go to the court of appeal, why shouldn't the people getting involved in a "pregnant accident" with a baby’s life at stake go to the court of appeal for a wise advice and fair solution?
The Mechanism of Court
Appeal for Abortion is not intended to take away women’s rights, but to safeguard their lives and their babies’ lives from misinformed and irresponsible choices. It could save up to 90% of babies from unnecessary abortions without endangering women's health.
How foolish are those legislators in New York to create such an evil law with huge loopholes just to cover such a small and rare exception?
In the famous Declaration of Independence of the United States, it is clearly stated that people of America have “unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Life is in the first position, liberty in the second position and the pursuit of happiness in the third position. No one can put his/her right of pursuit of happiness above other people’s right of life. Therefore, unless the mother is facing the life-threatening situation, no other right of choice can supersede the life of a baby who is ready to come to this world!
This new Reproduction Health Act goes too far to
the extreme and becomes the most evil law ever passed in modern American
history. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and some New York legislators even want to
add it to the current New York Constitution. They do not know what they are doing.
Governor Cuomo, you professed your faith as
a Catholic. I hope that you can put your faith into action and
apply the moral teachings of Jesus Christ as your guideline to your
policies and decisions. I am not asking you to impose your faith to
others, but I hope that you can follow the commonly accepted moral
standard that the Founding Fathers had built this nation upon. Two
thousand years have passed, and Christianity has grown from eleven
disciples to two billion believers worldwide. The teachings of Jesus
Christ have been proved by the historical testimony of the last two
thousand years. You can separate church and state, but you should not separate the time-tested Word of God from your heart. I just hope you, as a Christian, can always remember that "heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away."
(Matthew 24:35 Luke 21:33)
Now, some other states like Vermont,
Island and New Mexico also like to follow the footsteps of New York, but they don’t understand the consequence of this evil plot.
Millions of souls of aborted babies are crying for justice from God. If
people, especially the people in New York, do not repent and repeal or
correct this evil law, the judgment of God prophesied in the Book of
Revelation will come upon you. Save Babies! Save New York! Save America!
All people of God and
people with moral conscience should unite and speak out to protest this evil law
of RHA and stop it
from becoming part of the New York Constitution and setting bad precedent for the
rest of the nation. Stop the devil before it reaches your doorstep! Put baby’s right of life first before any other right of choice!
Merciful, just as
Your Father in Heaven is Merciful!"
Please follow @SonofManChrist
on Twitter and retweet this message to all your friends and followers.
Here is the PDF
version for FREE download and local/church distribution.
“The Celebration of Abomination”
Son of Man
O God, Father in Heaven,
I saw Satan laughing from below.
New York, O New York,
How Low Can Thou Go?
How dare you abort and kill a
Even after s/he is nine-month old,
A Precious Life with a beating heart
Same as yours but not as cold?
As the prophecies are
The “Fall of Babylon” is coming close.
Repent, and save those babies’ lives; or
The Judgment of God will come upon Thou!
To See the
Complete Picture of the Prophecies
in the Bible's Book of Revelation,
Please Order the Book
Thank You and God